http://www.unixmen.com/top-5-security-myths-about-linux-and-their-realities
Linux, unfortunately has been long
surrounded by myths. Despite the speedy adoption of Linux as mainstream
operating systems for enterprises particularly, the common
misconceptions about Linux seem to continue. The post enlists five
traditional myths about Linux Security and attempts to debunk each;
discussing real facts.
There exist mainly two schools of
thoughts regarding security of Linux. One group that assumes ‘ Linux is
Virus Proof’ and the other, advocating a completely contrary thought
i.e. ‘Linux is more insecure (when compared to contenders), as it makes
source code available to everyone’. Let’s investigate in detail.
Myth 1: Linux is insecure, as it makes source code available to everyone.
Reality: While this is
true that Linux makes Source code available to everyone to view and
inspect; it is this open source nature that makes Linux superior to any
proprietary OS in terms of security. As the source code is available to
anyone, thousands of develops around the world scrutinize the source
code for security pitfalls. Imagine, even at this very moment number of
people are reading and making the code better. It is far more easier to
spot and fix security issues on Linux than on any closed-source
platform. Additionally, if any security vulnerability is found on
closed source platform, it cannot be readily altered to make the
software secure. On the contrary, in case of open source software, if
any security hole is discovered patches are created as quickly as
possible (usually within hours) therefore the security flaw doesn’t last
for long enough to be exploited.
When asked about the lack of viruses
known for Linux platform, the proprietary camp claims that Linux is not
very popular to have viruses. This comprises another common Myth.
Interestingly, it’s not only the proprietary camp to believe that Linux
lacks virus because of its minimal market share, alot of literature on
the internet and in books we find this misconception.
Myth 2: Linux lacks virus because it is not very popular.
Many say that the purpose of virus writers is to bring massive destruction. As Linux does not run on as many computers as MS’s Windows does, virus writers only target Windows to damage more and more stations. While this might not be completely wrong, it’s not completely true too.
Many say that the purpose of virus writers is to bring massive destruction. As Linux does not run on as many computers as MS’s Windows does, virus writers only target Windows to damage more and more stations. While this might not be completely wrong, it’s not completely true too.
Reality: Linux might
not run on many desktop computers, BUT it runs on most computers in very
important places. All super computers run Linux. Many notable
governments have approved policies moving governmental computers to
Linux. Additionally there was a huge enterprise shift from Proprietary
OS to Linux in last 2000s recession. That means Linux, too is a very
charming opportunity for hackers; rather hackers would more likely to
write virus for Linux than for Windows if they want to bring even more
destruction (especially destruction in terms of quality then quantity!).
Therefore, the myth can easily be ruled out. Another reason that the
proprietary camp gives for lesser known viruses for Linux is that Linux
is an advanced OS and can only be used by professions who know how to
protect their systems.
Myth3: Linux is for experts who
know how to protect their system and therefore Linux does not get
viruses and it generally thought as secure
It is also a common misconception that
because Linux is for experts, they know well how to deal with viruses.
On the other hand, Windows, as being a simpler system is usually used by
even non-technical people who are naive enough to get virus and destroy
the whole system.
Reality: The concept ‘
Linux is for experts’ is itself a myth and quiet out dated now. Linux is
now one of the friendliest OS out there that can be used by novice and
experts both. There are Linux based computers dedicated for elderly
(heard of the Wow computer?). So to say that Linux is for experts is not
true. Linux is for everyone. Consequently to say, the Linux doesn’t get
virus because of its technically strong to defend OS is wrong.
What makes Linux secure is neither its
lack of popularity nor its technically strong user base. It is the
strong architecture of Linux which makes it secure. On Linux systems
users do not have “root” privileges; instead they possess lower-level
accounts. As a result even if a Linux system is somehow compromised, the
virus shall not have root access to bring about any major damage to the
system. Windows supports exe files, a format in which virus are
transmitted. Linux, on the other hand does not support .exe files. Linux
uses configuration files in place of registry files hence closing this
door for virus. For the Linux servers now, Linux servers employ several
level of security. Linux servers are updated more often. To conclude,
it’s the Linux architecture that is different from that of contending
proprietary OS which makes it secure. That is to say if Linux is adopted
in main stream desktop computing, I am sure that Linux will prove to be
more strong and less incline to get virus than contending OS.
Does that mean Linux is virus free? This comprises of our third Myth.
Myth 4: Linux is virus free
Reality: while Linux is
very secure and superior to its proprietary counterparts, it’s not
virus free. There are a number of viruses known for Linux. I have
compiled popular known viruses in this post. It may be noted that all
most all the viruses known for Linux are non-destructive in nature (but
not non-existent)
Myth 5: On Linux system you don’t need an Anti virus.
Reality: Yes indeed
it’s very much true that when you are running Linux OS you are secure.
Never the less one must realize that no OS is 100% secure. While this
might not be very important for desktop/home users; enterprise sector
which use Linux, may require anti-virus. Occasional scanning, backing up
data and checking your system for malicious software does not bring
harm to anyone. This does not mean you need to spend substantial amount
of cash on expensive anti- virus softwares. Any free or open source and
free antivirus would do justice to your security!
No comments:
Post a Comment