https://www.lifewire.com/which-is-the-best-compression-tool-for-linux-4082712
Introduction
When it comes to finding file compression tools
in Linux you are left with a number of different choices but which one
is the best?
In this guide, I will put
zip,
gzip and
bzip2 through their paces to see which one is best.
I
have conducted a number of tests against different file types and using
different settings for each tool and here are the results
Best Tool For Compressing Windows Documents
Before
looking at a more detailed test I wanted to try each compression tool
against a single file type so that we could see how each tool handles
the file in question.
These tests have been run against the
Microsoft DOCX format.
Default Settings
I have started with default settings for each program.
Tool | File Size |
Initial Filesize | 12202 bytes |
zip | 9685 |
gzip | 9537 |
bzip2 | 10109 |
Best Compression
This time I have gone for maximum compression,
Tool | File Size |
Initial Filesize | 12202 bytes |
zip | 9677 |
gzip | 9530 |
bzip2 | 10109 |
To make sure this wasn't a fluke I tried the same test against 2 other documents.
File 1:
Tool | File Size |
Initial Filesize | 14913176 |
zip | 14657475 |
gzip | 14657328 |
bzip2 | 14741042 |
File 2:
Tool | File Size |
Initial Filesize | 13314 |
zip | 10814 |
gzip | 10653 |
bzip2 | 11254 |
Two
of the files contained text only whereas the larger file contained a
lot of pages of text with lots of images and a lot of formatting.
From the first test gzip comes out on top in all categories and bzip2 is the least effective.
Best Tool For Compressing Images
This time I am going to show the results of compressing various image formats such as PNG and JPG.
In theory, JPG files are already compressed and therefore may not compress at all and could, in theory, make the file bigger.
PNG File
Tool | File Size |
Initial Filesize | 345265 |
zip | 345399 |
gzip | 345247 |
bzip2 | 346484 |
JPEG File
Tool | File Size |
Initial Filesize | 44340 |
zip | 44165 |
gzip | 44015 |
bzip2 | 44281 |
Bitmap File
Tool | File Size |
Initial Filesize | 3113334 |
zip | 495028 |
gzip | 494883 |
bzip2 | 397569 |
GIF File
Tool | File Size |
Initial Filesize | 6164 |
zip | 5772 |
gzip | 5627 |
bzip2 | 6051 |
In
all cases, gzip came out on top again except for one and that was the
humble bitmap. The bzip2 compression produced a tiny file in comparison
to the original.
Best Tool For Compressing Audio Files
The most common audio format is
MP3 and in theory, this has already been compressed so the tools may actually end up increasing the file size.
I am going to test two files:
File 1:
Tool | File Size |
Initial Filesize | 5278905 |
zip | 5270224 |
gzip | 5270086 |
bzip2 | 5270491 |
File 2:
Tool | File Size |
Initial Filesize | 4135331 |
zip | 4126138 |
gzip | 4126000 |
bzip2 | 4119410 |
This
time the results were inconclusive. The compression in all cases was
minimal but it is interesting that bzip2 came out the worst for file 1
and the best for file 2.
Best Tool For Compressing Video
In this test, I am going to compress 2 video files. As with MP3 the
MP4
file already contains a level of compression and so the results will
probably prove to be negligible in terms of how well the tools perform.
I have also included an
FLV file which will not have any level of compression as it is a lossless format.
MP4:
Tool | File Size |
Initial Filesize | 731908 |
zip | 478546 |
gzip | 478407 |
bzip2 | 478042 |
Yet again the bzip2 format came out better than the other file types.
At this stage, it would seem that
there is little difference as to which tool you use. The results are
close across the board for all file types and sometimes gzip is best and
others bzip2 is best and the zip command is usually there or
thereabouts.
FLV:
Tool | File Size |
Initial Filesize | 7833634 |
zip | 4339169 |
gzip | 4339030 |
bzip2 | 4300295 |
It would appear that if you are compressing video that bzip2 is the compression tool of choice.
Executables
The last single category that I will try is executables.
As executables are compiled the code I suspect that they won't compress very well.
File 1:
Tool | File Size |
Initial Filesize | 26557472 |
zip | 26514031 |
gzip | 26513892 |
bzip2 | 26639209 |
File 2:
Tool | File Size |
Initial Filesize | 195629144 |
zip | 193951631 |
gzip | 193951493 |
bzip2 | 194834876 |
Again we see that gzip comes out on top and bzip2 comes last. For the smaller executable the bzip file actually grew in size.
Complete Folder Test
Thus
far I have dealt with individual files. This time I have a folder full
of images, documents, spreadsheets, videos, audio files, executables and
many other different file formats.
I have created a tar file
which makes it easier to compress using all of the tools available. The
gzip and bzip2 commands work against single files whereas the zip
command can work against folders.
By using the tar command I have created a single file which contains all of the folders and files in an uncompressed format.
I am going to monitor a number of things in this test:
- Compress using default compression settings - report results by file sizes
- Compress using default compression settings - report results by time was taken
- Compress using best compression - report results by file sizes
- Compress using best compression - report results by time was taken
- Compress using fastest compression - report results by file sizes
- Compress using fastest compression - report results by time taken
Default Compression
Tool | File Size | Time Taken |
Initial File | 1333084160 | 0 |
zip | 1303177778 | 1 minute 10 seconds |
gzip | 1303177637 | 1 minute 35 seconds |
bzip2 | 1309234947 | 6 minutes 5 seconds |
Maximum Compression
Tool | File Size | Time Taken |
Initial File | 1333084160 | 0 |
zip | 1303107894 | 1 minute 10 seconds |
gzip | 1303107753 | 1 minute 35 seconds |
bzip2 | 1309234947 | 6 minutes 10 seconds |
Fastest Compression
Tool | File Size | Time Taken |
Initial File | 1333084160 | 0 |
zip | 1304163943 | 1 minute 0 seconds |
gzip | 1304163802 | 1 minute 15 seconds |
bzip2 | 1313557595 | 6 minutes 10 seconds |
Summary
Based
on the final test it is clear that bzip2 is not as useful as the other 2
compression tools. It takes longer to compress the files and the final
file size is larger.
The difference between zip and gzip is
negligible, and whilst gzip generally comes out on top, the zip format
is more common across different operating systems.
So my verdict is that definitely use either zip or gzip but maybe bzip2 has had its day and needs to be confined to history.
No comments:
Post a Comment